@nytimes
The New York Times
a month ago
A growing number of forensic researchers are questioning how the field interprets the geographic ancestry of human remains.
21
31
163

Replies

@bemeevrytime
Bee
a month ago
@nytimes May.. It eats too much Ravioli? 🤔
0
0
0
@courtines
Laurent Courtines - CFCP Productions
a month ago
@nytimes Madness.
0
0
0
@LeeColenso
lee colenso
a month ago
@nytimes That’s a loaded issue on so many levels
0
0
1
@bleakboss
👻 Генри Хадсон
a month ago
@nytimes Ask a dentist.
0
0
0
@Ouchy
Ouchy
a month ago
@nytimes So bored of pay walls.
0
0
0
@mfhanauer
Trump's a Loser✌️😷 💉
a month ago
@nytimes It's time that this issue was addressed. Many remains have been misidentified or remain unidentified due to the original conclusion that the person was a different race or sex.
0
0
0
@DenimSlinger
Forty Quinn 🎾
a month ago
@nytimes Slow news night lol. Talkin about old shit
0
0
0
@mgluchinski
Mark Luchinski
a month ago
@nytimes They did up until a few years ago
0
0
0