@Reuters
Reuters
5 days ago
Study faults California for building homes in wildfire areas https://t.co/2M0epz127o https://t.co/HlzFhSG8Rr
Tweet media one
18
34
99

Replies

@EmilyLogicrules
logicrules
5 days ago
@Reuters We needed a study for that? Let’s study whether water is wet next, shall we? 🤦🏻‍♀️
1
0
0
@TheScottPMiller
Scott Miller
5 days ago
@Reuters See, if there were no houses, there would be no house fires! 🔥
0
0
0
@ArmaniX57
ARMANI▪X
5 days ago
@Reuters What about the people who willingly buy them?!
0
0
1
@barbdignan
Barb Dignan
5 days ago
@Reuters I remember decades ago reading that people should NOT build homes in the mountains, in forests...but nobody listened.
0
0
1
@johnc1411
Johnny C
5 days ago
@Reuters 100 million is too many?
0
0
0
@KateLenox1
Kate Lenox
5 days ago
@Reuters There's 58 counties in CA. Take it up with them.
0
0
0
@legendofcheese
Zack Veverka ☭
5 days ago
@Reuters If there’s one thing I can assure you California does not do, it’s build homes.
0
0
0
@JessieE92188993
Jessie Everett
5 days ago
@Reuters Should've chop those trees down
0
0
2
@ZenLegionaire
Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici
5 days ago
@Reuters @eqca @CAgovernor GIVE homes to firefighters and ex-firefighters. Space them out strategically in communities and create mini-substations for their equipment. if small fires can be extinguished by these volunteers before they spread, BIG FIRES can be averted, or less in number
0
0
0